We did not wish to be prescriptive as to what such centres looked like and how they operated, and accepted that there would be variation from centre to centre depending on local circumstances. We were open to creative and innovative ideas.
However, we looked for as many of the following attributes as possible from the hosting schools:
If schools were interested, we asked these schools to submit a formal proposal to the trustees, outlining how they would best run a centre. In exceptional circumstances, the trustees were willing to consider proposals put forward on a school’s own initiative.
In assessing proposals, we considered issues such as:
The Foundation has supported the creation of centres for teaching Chinese, and now helps to support their running by funding costs such as teachers’ salaries and training, pupils’ trips to China, administration and technology. We expect the schools and universities involved in the centres to become self-sufficient and aim to support them up to that point.
“The Swire Chinese Language Foundation have been extremely supportive but at no time have they tried to impose a certain model of delivery nor have they been prescriptive in any way. Rather, they have encouraged us a Swire Centre to adopt an approach which is most suitable and that will work in our context.”